The political debte on West Bengal's rural transformation is not new. But after Singur and Nandigram, it got a new lease of life.
Pragoti is reproducing the debate between Patrick Bond and Mahmood Mamdani,on the political impasse in Zimbabwe that was triggered off by Mamdani's article - 'Lessons of Zimbabwe'. Patrick Bond argues that Mugabe's survival is closely linked with the existing system of crony capitalism buttressed by extensive patronage. Mamdani on the other hand,traces the historic roots of the land question, and asserts the role of Western imperialism in the current situation and excessive vilification of Mugabe.
Such is the power of the media, that in recent months, the very names of Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal have become synonymous with forcible land acquisition by the state all over India. This is truly remarkable, because in fact no land was ever actually acquired for industrialisation in Nandigram after the violent protests against it. And it is widely acknowledged that the terms of acquisition of the 1000 acres required for the Tata automobile factory in Singur were the most favourable for the peasantry, of any such acquisition across India.
New data show that, even over the last three years, the extent of land acquired by the State government for industrial and infrastructural purposes was a fraction of the agricultural land distributed under land reform. Prof. V.K.Ramachandran writes in The Hindu. Article courtesy, The Hindu.
Interview with National Institute of Agrarian Reform (INRA) Secretary General Juan de Dios Fernández